Former Special Prosecutor Martin Amidu has openly criticized Ghana’s judiciary, specifically targeting the Chief Justice’s decision to close courts in Bolgatanga and surrounding areas due to perceived security risks.
Amidu argues that this decision sets a worrying precedent, potentially restricting access to justice in regions already facing security challenges, such as Bawku. According to him, the judiciary should prioritize making justice accessible to all citizens, rather than “abandoning their posts at the slightest hint of trouble.” He contends that closing courts based on vague “stakeholder concerns” raises serious questions about transparency and accountability.
Amidu questioned the level of stakeholder consultation involved in the decision to close these courts, wondering if the affected communities were even part of the process. “Who exactly are these stakeholders who expressed concerns over security? Were the people of Bolgatanga consulted?” he asked, stressing that the judiciary has a duty to protect public access to justice, particularly in areas facing security issues.
His concerns extend beyond the judiciary to Parliament, which he criticizes for neglecting national priorities. Amidu expressed disappointment over what he views as a misplaced legislative focus—particularly on recent discussions regarding MPs planning to run as independents. “The current focus on MPs who intend to run as independents is, frankly, misguided,” he remarked, noting that this preoccupation detracts from lawmakers’ responsibility to address more pressing issues, such as oversight of the judiciary and
